Circle Composition Essay In Lecture Ring Series Terry Thinking

Many famous antique texts are misunderstood and many others have been completely dismissed, all because the literary style in which they were written is unfamiliar today. So argues Mary Douglas in this controversial study of ring composition, a technique which places the meaning of a text in the middle, framed by a beginning and ending in parallel. To read a ring composition in the modern linear fashion is to misinterpret it, Douglas contends, and today’s scholars must reevaluate important antique texts from around the world.

Found in the Bible and in writings from as far afield as Egypt, China, Indonesia, Greece, and Russia, ring composition is too widespread to have come from a single source. Does it perhaps derive from the way the brain works? What is its function in social contexts? The author examines ring composition, its principles and functions, in a cross-cultural way. She focuses on ring composition in Homer’s Iliad, the Bible’s book of Numbers, and, for a challenging modern example, Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy, developing a persuasive argument for reconstruing famous books and rereading neglected ones.

Las Conferencias Terry (Terry Lectures), o Conferencias Dwight H. Terry, se iniciaron en la Universidad de Yale en 1905 por una donación de Dwight H. Terry de Bridgeport, Connecticut. Su propósito es involucrar tanto a estudiosos como al público en una consideración de la religión desde un punto de vista humanista, a la luz de la ciencia y de la filosofía moderna. El tema ha sido históricamente similar a la de las Gifford Lectures en Escocia, y varios profesores han participado en ambas series.

ProfesorAñoTema
Janet Browne2015Becoming Darwin: History, Memory, and Biography
Wendy Doniger2014The Manipulation of Religion by the Sciences of Politics and Pleasure in Ancient India
Philip Kitcher2013Secular Humanism
Keith S. Thomson2012Jefferson and Darwin: Science and Religion in Troubled Times
Joel R. Primack y Nancy Ellen Abrams2010Cosmic Society: The New Universe and the Human Future
Marilynne Robinson2009Absence of Mind: The Dispelling of Inwardness from the Modern Myth of the Self[1][2][3][4]
Donald S. Lopez2008The Scientific Buddha: Past, Present, Future[5][6]
Terry Eagleton2008Faith and Fundamentalism: Is Belief in Richard Dawkins Necessary for Salvation?[7][8][9][10]
Ahmad Dallal2007Islam, Science, and the Challenge of History[11][12][13][14]
Barbara Herrnstein Smith2006Natural Reflections: Human Cognition at the Nexus of Science and Religion[15][16]
Robert Wuthnow2006No Contradictions Here: Science, Religion, and the Culture of All Reasonable Possibilities[17][18][19]
Lawrence M. Krauss2006Religion vs. Science? From the White House to Classroom
Alvin Plantinga2006Science and Religion: Why Does the Debate Continue?
Kenneth R. Miller2006Darwin, God, and Dover: What the Collapse of 'Intelligent Design' Means for Science and for Faith in America
Ronald L. Numbers2006Aggressors, Victims, and Peacemakers: Historical Actors in the Drama of Science and Religion
David Sloan Wilson2004Evolution for Everyone[20][21][22][23]
Mary Douglas2003Writing in Circles: Ring Composition as a Creative Stimulus[24][25]
H. C. Erik Midelfort2003Exorcism and Enlightenment: Johann Joseph Gassner and the Demons of 18th-Century Germany[26][27][28]
Francisco J. Ayala2001From Biology to Ethics: An Evolutionist's View of Human Nature[29][30]
Peter Singer2000One World: The Ethics and Politics of Globalization[31][32][33][34][35]
Bas C. Van Fraassen1999The Empirical Stance[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]
David Hartman1998Struggling for the Soul of Israel: A Jewish Response to History[43][44][45][46][47]
John Polkinghorne1996-97Belief in God in an Age of Science[48][49][50][51][52]
Walter J. Gehring1993-94Genetic Control of Development[53]
Joshua Lederberg1988-89Science and Modern Life
Eric R. Kandel1986-87Cell and Molecular Biological Explorations of Learning and Memory
Stephen Jay Gould1985-86Darwin and Dr. Doolittle: ‘Just History’ as the Wellspring of Nature’s Order
Hans Jonas1979-80Technology and Ethics
Adin Steinsaltz1978-79
Hans Kung1977-78Freud and the Problem of God[54][55][56]
Philip Reiff1976-77
David Baken1975-76And They Took Themselves Wives: Male Female Relations in the Bible
Theodore M. Hesburgh1973-74The Humane Imperative: A Challenge for the Year 2000
James Hillman1971-72Re-Visioning Pychology[57][58]
Albert J. Reiss, Jr.1968-69Civility and the Moral Order
Clifford Geertz1967-68In Search of Islam: Religious Change in Indonesia
Loren Eiseley1966-67
James Munro Cameron1964-65Images of Authority: A Consideration of the Concept of Regnum and Sacerdotium[59]
Walter Jackson Ong1963-64The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History
Michael Polanyi1962-63Man and Thought: A Symbiosis
Norbert Wiener1961-62The Philosopher Before Symbols
Paul Ricoeur1961-62Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation[60][61]
Hermann Doerries1958-59Constantine and Religious Liberty[62][63][64][65]
Margaret Mead1957-58Continuities in Cultural Evolution
Errol Eustace Harris1956-57The Idea of God in Modern Thought
Rebecca West1955-56The Court and the Castle: Some Treatments of a Recurrent Theme
Pieter Geyl1954-55Use and Abuse of History[66][67][68]
Gordon Willard Allport1953-54Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality[69][70][71]
Jerome Clarke Hunsaker1951-52Aeronautics at the Mid-Century
Paul Johannes Tillich1950-51The Courage to Be[72]
Erich Fromm1949-50Psychoanalysis and Religion[73][74]
George Gaylord Simpson1948-49The Meaning of Evolution[75][76][77]
Alexander Stewart Ferguson1947-48
Charles Hartshorne1946-47The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God[78][79]
Henri Frankfort1946-47
James Bryant Conant1945-46On Understanding Science[80][81]
Julius Seelye Bixler1944-45Conversations with an Unrepentant Liberal[82]
George Washington Corner1943-44Ourselves Unborn: An Embryologist’s Essay on Man[83]
Jacques Maritain1942-43Education at the Crossroads[84][85][86][87]
Alexander Dunlop Lindsay1942-43Religion, Science, and Society in the Modern World
Reinhold Niebuhr1941-42
Alan Gregg1940-41The Furtherance of Medical Research
Henry Ernest Sigerist1939-40Medicine and Human Welfare[88]
Peter Henry Buck1938-39Anthropology and Religion
Carl Gustav Jung1937-38Psychology and Religion[89]
Joseph Barcroft1936-37The Brain and Its Environment
John Macmurray1935-36The Structure of Religious Experience
Joseph Needham1934-35Order and Life
John Dewey1933-34A Common Faith[90][91]
Herbert Spencer Jennings1932-33The Universe and Life
Arthur Holly Compton1931-32The Freedom of Man
Hermann Weyl1930-31The Open World
William Pepperell Montague1929-30Belief Unbound: A Promethean Religion for the Modern World[92][93][94][95]
James Young Simpson1928-29Nature: Cosmic, Human, and Divine
William Brown1927-28Science and Personality
Robert Andrews Millikan1926-27Evolution in Science and Religion
William Ernest Hocking1925-26The Self: Its Body and Freedom
Henry Norris Russell1924-25Fate and Freedom
John Arthur Thomson1923-24Concerning Evolution

Referencias[editar]

  1. ↑Dueholm, Benjamin (11 de febrero de 2015). «Unconformed: A Review of Reason, Faith, and Revolution by Terry Eagleton and Absence of Mind by Marilynne Robinson - Let's Talk». Let's Talk(en inglés estadounidense). Consultado el 20 de enero de 2017. 
  2. ↑Kirsch, Adam (25 de abril de 2010). «Blinded by parascience - The Boston Globe». archive.boston.com(en inglés). Consultado el 20 de enero de 2017. 
  3. ↑Hustvedt, Siri (3 de julio de 2010). «Absence of Mind». Financial Times. Consultado el 20 de enero de 2017. 
  4. ↑McCullough Moore, Linda (Jun 2010). «Absence of Mind». Books and Culture(en inglés). Consultado el 20 de enero de 2017. 
  5. ↑Arnold, Dan (2015). «Review of The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life, Lopez, Donald S». The Journal of Religion95 (1): 141-143. doi:10.1086/680538. Consultado el 21 de enero de 2017. 
  6. ↑Robinson, Andrew (1 de octubre de 2013). «The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life: By Donald. S.LopezJr. pp. 148. Boston, Yale University Press, 2012.». Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society23 (4): 591-592. ISSN 1356-1863. doi:10.1017/S1356186313000138. Consultado el 21 de enero de 2017. 
  7. ↑Eagleton, Terry (2014). Reason, Faith, & Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300155506. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  8. ↑Vallely, Paul (17 de julio de 2009). «Reason, Faith and Revolution, By Terry Eagleton». The Independent(en inglés británico). Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  9. ↑Furuhashi, Yoshie. «Terry Eagleton, "Reason, Faith, and Revolution"». mrzine.monthlyreview.org. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  10. ↑Gates, Amy L. (18 de mayo de 2011). «Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate (review)». symploke18 (1): 405-407. ISSN 1534-0627. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  11. ↑Dallal, Ahmad S. (2010). Islam, Science, and the Challenge of History(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300159145. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  12. ↑Morrison, Robert G. (1 de septiembre de 2011). «Ahmad Dallal. Islam, Science, and the Challenge of History.». Isis102 (3): 543-544. ISSN 0021-1753. doi:10.1086/663022. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  13. ↑Savage-Smith, Emilie (2011). «Review of Islam, Science, and the Challenge of History». The British Journal for the History of Science44 (3): 455-456. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  14. ↑Stearns, Justin (2011). «Review of Islam, Science, and the Challenge of History». Journal of the American Oriental Society131 (1): 166-169. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  15. ↑Smith, Barbara Herrnstein (2009). Natural Reflections: Human Cognition at the Nexus of Science and Religion. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300140347. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  16. ↑Watts, Fraser (1 de marzo de 2012). «Barbara Herrnstein Smith. Natural Reflections: Human Cognition at the Nexus of Science and Religion.Michael Ruse. Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science.». Isis103 (1): 220-222. ISSN 0021-1753. doi:10.1086/666458. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  17. ↑Attridge, Harold W.; Numbers, Ronald L. (2009). The Religion and Science Debate: Why Does It Continue?(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 030015299X. Consultado el 13 de enero de 2017. 
  18. ↑Evans, John H. (2010). «Review of The Religion and Science Debate: Why Does it Continue?». Contemporary Sociology39 (3): 272-274. Consultado el 13 de enero de 2017. 
  19. ↑Thomson, Keith; Numbers, Ronald L.; Miller, Kenneth R.; Plantinga, Alvin; Krauss, Lawrence M.; Wuthnow, Robert (2009). Attridge, Harold W., ed. The Religion and Science Debate: Why Does It Continue?. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300152982. Consultado el 13 de enero de 2017. 
  20. ↑Jervis, Charles K. (2007). «Review of Evolution For Everyone: How Darwin's Theory Can Change the Way We Think About Our Lives». Journal of College Science Teaching37 (1): 64-65. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  21. ↑Jervis, Charles K. (2008). «Review of Evolution for Everyone: How Darwin's Theory Can Change the Way We Think About Our Lives». The Science Teacher75 (8): 85-86. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  22. ↑Ebert-May, Diane (2008). «Evolution Extended». BioScience58 (6): 558-560. doi:10.1641/b580615. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  23. ↑Zimmerman, William F. (2009). «Review of Evolution for Everyone: How Darwin's Theory Can Change the Way We Think About Our Lives, David Sloan Wilson». The Quarterly Review of Biology84 (1): 96-97. doi:10.1086/598277. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  24. ↑Douglas, Mary (2007). Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300134959. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  25. ↑Treanor, Lucia (2009). «Review of Thinking in Circles: An Essay in Ring Composition». The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism67 (2): 254-256. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  26. ↑Marschke, Benjamin (2009). «Review of Exorcism and Enlightenment: Johann Joseph Gassner and the Demons of Eighteenth-Century Germany». Central European History42 (1): 145-147. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  27. ↑Boettcher, Susan R. (1 de diciembre de 2008). «H. C. Erik Midelfort, Exorcism and Enlightenment: Johann Joseph Gassner and the Demons of Eighteenth-Century Germany.». The Journal of Modern History80 (4): 950-952. ISSN 0022-2801. doi:10.1086/596692. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  28. ↑Midelfort, H. C. Erik (2005). Exorcism and Enlightenment: Johann Joseph Gassner and the Demons of Eighteenth-century Germany(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300130139. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  29. ↑Boniolo, Giovanni; Anna, Gabriele De (3 de julio de 2006). Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology(en inglés). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139458412. Consultado el 14 de enero de 2017. 
  30. ↑Rottshaefer, William A.; Rottschaefer, W. A. (2007). «Review of Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology». History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences29 (2): 249-250. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  31. ↑Madsen, Peter (2004). «Peter Singer on Global Ethics». Business Ethics Quarterly14 (1): 183-196. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  32. ↑Whong-Barr, Michael (2003). «Singer's World». International Studies Review5 (3): 406-408. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  33. ↑McNicoll, Geottrey (2004). «Review of One World: The Ethics of Globalization». Population and Development Review30 (3): 552-555. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  34. ↑Green, Michael J. (1 de abril de 2004). «Peter Singer, One World: The Ethics of Globalization». Ethics114 (3): 634-638. ISSN 0014-1704. doi:10.1086/382172. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  35. ↑Crosby, Alfred W. (2003). «Globalization as Boon or Curse». The International History Review25 (2): 375-379. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  36. ↑Millgram, Elijah (2006). «Review of The Empirical Stance». The Philosophical Review115 (3): 404-408. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  37. ↑Bagir, Zainal Abidin (1 de octubre de 2003). «Bas C. van fraassen: The Empirical Stance,». Philosophy of Science70 (4): 842-844. ISSN 0031-8248. doi:10.1086/378871. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  38. ↑Teller, Paul (2004). «Discussion: What Is a Stance?». Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition121 (2): 159-170. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  39. ↑O'Grady, Paul (2004). «Review of The Empirical Stance». The Review of Metaphysics57 (4): 870-872. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  40. ↑Ladyman, James (2004). «Discussion: Empiricism versus Metaphysics». Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition121 (2): 133-145. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  41. ↑Lipton, Peter (2004). «Discussion: Epistemic Options». Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition121 (2): 147-158. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  42. ↑van Fraassen, Bas C. (2004). «Replies to Discussion on "The Empirical Stance"». Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition121 (2): 171-192. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  43. ↑Hartman, David (2008). Israelis and the Jewish Tradition: An Ancient People Debating Its Future(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300130511. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  44. ↑Ellenson, David (2001). «David Hartman on Judaism and the Modern Condition: A Review Essay». Modern Judaism21 (3): 256-281. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  45. ↑Kellner, Menachem (2002). «Review of Israelis and the Jewish Tradition: An Ancient People Debating Its Future». The Jewish Quarterly Review92 (3/4): 609-612. doi:10.2307/1455466. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  46. ↑Arnold, Peri E. (2001). «The Word and the World». The Review of Politics63 (3): 598-601. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  47. ↑Diamond, James A. (2004). «Maimonidean Scholarship: Pointing the Way beyond the Academy». Jewish History18 (2/3): 227-241. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  48. ↑Davis, Edward B. (1998). «A God Who Does Not Itemize Versus a Science of the Sacred». American Scientist86 (6): 572-574. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2017. 
  49. ↑Polkinghorne, John (1998). Belief in God in an Age of Science(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300174101. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2017. 
  50. ↑Weldon, Stephen P. (1 de septiembre de 2001). «Belief in God in an Age of Science. John Polkinghorne». Isis92 (3): 599-600. ISSN 0021-1753. doi:10.1086/385305. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2017. 
  51. ↑Numrich, Paul D.; Numrich, Robert W. (2000). «Review of Belief in God in an Age of Science, ; Genes, Genesis and God: Values and Their Origins in Natural and Human History, Holmes Rolston, III; The Genetic Gods: Evolution and Belief in Human Affairs». Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion39 (2): 247-249. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2017. 
  52. ↑Brennan, Fergal (1998). «Review of Belief in God in an Age of Science». Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review87 (347): 313-316. Consultado el 9 de enero de 2017. 
  53. ↑Gehring, Walter J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Homeobox Story(en inglés). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300074093. Consultado el 15 de enero de 2017. 
  54. ↑Homans, Peter (1983). «Review of Freud and the Problem of God, Hans Küng». The Journal of Religion63 (3): 308-311. Consultado el 19 de enero de 2017. 
  55. ↑Thompson, Thomas H. (1981). «Freud vs. Theological Rationalism: A Stalemate?». The North American Review266 (2): 54-58. Consultado el 20 de enero de 2017.

0 Replies to “Circle Composition Essay In Lecture Ring Series Terry Thinking”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *